Download subtitle and video from Youtube

Quicky way to download subtitle and video from Youtube: go to https://thetv.info/[youtube-id]
E.g. Change https://youtu.be/6I2BnX32qNQ to https://thetv.info/6I2BnX32qNQ

Video Republican Describes Donald Trump's Handling Of The Shutdown As Total Chaos | The Last Word | MSNBC

TheTV.info
19:54   |   today at 01:47

Transcription

  • >> NOTHING LIKE IT. >> WELL DONE, MY FRIEND.
  • >> WELL DONE, MY FRIEND. THANKS, LAWRENCE.
  • THANKS, LAWRENCE. >> THANK YOU, RACHEL.
  • >> THANK YOU, RACHEL. >>> WELL, IN "VANITY FAIR,"
  • >>> WELL, IN "VANITY FAIR," GABRIEL SHERMAN IS REPORTING
  • GABRIEL SHERMAN IS REPORTING THAT A PROMINENT REPUBLICAN
  • THAT A PROMINENT REPUBLICAN CLOSE TO SENATE MAJORITY LEADER
  • CLOSE TO SENATE MAJORITY LEADER MITCH McCONNELL DESCRIBED
  • MITCH McCONNELL DESCRIBED TRUMP’S HANDLING OF THE SHUTDOWN
  • TRUMP’S HANDLING OF THE SHUTDOWN AS TOTAL CHAOS.
  • AS TOTAL CHAOS. AND IN THE ACTUAL QUOTE BETWEEN
  • AND IN THE ACTUAL QUOTE BETWEEN THE WORD TOTAL AND CHAOS IS THAT
  • THE WORD TOTAL AND CHAOS IS THAT HEAVY PIECE OF PROFANITY THAT
  • HEAVY PIECE OF PROFANITY THAT REX TILLERSON REPORTEDLY USED TO
  • REX TILLERSON REPORTEDLY USED TO DESCRIBE EXACTLY WHAT KIND OF
  • DESCRIBE EXACTLY WHAT KIND OF MORON DONALD TRUMP IS.
  • MORON DONALD TRUMP IS. AND THAT CHAOS CONTINUED TODAY
  • AND THAT CHAOS CONTINUED TODAY BECAUSE NANCY PELOSI JUST SAID
  • BECAUSE NANCY PELOSI JUST SAID NO.
  • NO. AND WHEN THE SPEAKER OF THE
  • AND WHEN THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE SAYS NO TO THE CURRENT
  • HOUSE SAYS NO TO THE CURRENT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES,
  • PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, DONALD TRUMP LITERALLY DOES NOT
  • DONALD TRUMP LITERALLY DOES NOT KNOW WHAT TO DO OR TO SAY.
  • KNOW WHAT TO DO OR TO SAY. BECAUSE PRIOR TO SPEAKER NANCY
  • BECAUSE PRIOR TO SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI, DONALD TRUMP HAS NEVER
  • PELOSI, DONALD TRUMP HAS NEVER HEARD THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE
  • HEARD THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE SAY NO.
  • SAY NO. WHEN IT COMES TO LEGISLATIVE
  • WHEN IT COMES TO LEGISLATIVE MATTERS, THE SPEAKER OF THE
  • MATTERS, THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE IS ALWAYS MORE POWERFUL
  • HOUSE IS ALWAYS MORE POWERFUL THAN THE PRESIDENT.
  • THAN THE PRESIDENT. THAT IS BY CONSTITUTIONAL
  • THAT IS BY CONSTITUTIONAL DESIGN.
  • DESIGN. THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE ALWAYS
  • THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE ALWAYS HAS THE POWER TO SAY NO TO
  • HAS THE POWER TO SAY NO TO PRESIDENTIAL LEGISLATION, AND
  • PRESIDENTIAL LEGISLATION, AND THEY OFTEN DO, EVEN WHEN THE
  • THEY OFTEN DO, EVEN WHEN THE PRESIDENT IS IN THE SAME PARTY
  • PRESIDENT IS IN THE SAME PARTY AS THE SPEAKER.
  • AS THE SPEAKER. NO ONE REMEMBERS GEORGE W.
  • NO ONE REMEMBERS GEORGE W. BUSH’S RE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN
  • BUSH’S RE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN PROMISE THAT MADE REFORMING
  • PROMISE THAT MADE REFORMING SOCIAL SECURITY A NUMBER ONE
  • SOCIAL SECURITY A NUMBER ONE PRIORITY FOR THE SECOND TERM OF
  • PRIORITY FOR THE SECOND TERM OF THE BUSH PRESIDENCY, AND NO ONE
  • THE BUSH PRESIDENCY, AND NO ONE REMEMBERS THAT BECAUSE THE
  • REMEMBERS THAT BECAUSE THE REPUBLICAN SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE
  • REPUBLICAN SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE SAID NO TO THE REPUBLICAN
  • SAID NO TO THE REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT.
  • PRESIDENT. SO DID THE REPUBLICAN SENATE
  • SO DID THE REPUBLICAN SENATE MAJORITY LEADER.
  • MAJORITY LEADER. AND SO THE REPUBLICAN
  • AND SO THE REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT’S NUMBER ONE PRIORITY
  • PRESIDENT’S NUMBER ONE PRIORITY OF REFORMING SOCIAL SECURITY
  • OF REFORMING SOCIAL SECURITY NEVER EVEN GOT A HEARING IN THE
  • NEVER EVEN GOT A HEARING IN THE HOUSE OR THE SENATE BECAUSE WHEN
  • HOUSE OR THE SENATE BECAUSE WHEN IT COMES TO LEGISLATION, THE
  • IT COMES TO LEGISLATION, THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE IS MORE
  • SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE IS MORE POWERFUL THAN THE PRESIDENT AND
  • POWERFUL THAN THE PRESIDENT AND EVERY PREVIOUS PRESIDENT HAS
  • EVERY PREVIOUS PRESIDENT HAS UNDERSTOOD THAT, AND SO EVERY
  • UNDERSTOOD THAT, AND SO EVERY PREVIOUS PRESIDENT HAS TREATED
  • PREVIOUS PRESIDENT HAS TREATED THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE
  • THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE PUBLICLY WITH RESPECT AND
  • PUBLICLY WITH RESPECT AND PRIVATELY WITH EVEN MORE
  • PRIVATELY WITH EVEN MORE RESPECT.
  • RESPECT. BUT TODAY THE PRESIDENT OF THE
  • BUT TODAY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES GOT UP AND WALKED
  • UNITED STATES GOT UP AND WALKED OUT ON THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE
  • OUT ON THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE BECAUSE NANCY PELOSI SAID NO.
  • BECAUSE NANCY PELOSI SAID NO. >> HE ASKED SPEAKER PELOSI, WILL
  • >> HE ASKED SPEAKER PELOSI, WILL YOU AGREE TO MY WALL?
  • YOU AGREE TO MY WALL? SHE SAID NO AND HE JUST GOT UP
  • SHE SAID NO AND HE JUST GOT UP AND SAID, THEN WE HAVE NOTHING
  • AND SAID, THEN WE HAVE NOTHING TO DISCUSS AND HE JUST WALKED
  • TO DISCUSS AND HE JUST WALKED OUT.
  • OUT. AGAIN, WE SAW A TEMPER TANTRUM
  • AGAIN, WE SAW A TEMPER TANTRUM BECAUSE HE COULDN’T GET HIS WAY.
  • BECAUSE HE COULDN’T GET HIS WAY. >> THE REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL
  • >> THE REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP IN THE ROOM WITH THE
  • LEADERSHIP IN THE ROOM WITH THE PRESIDENT AND NANCY PELOSI AND
  • PRESIDENT AND NANCY PELOSI AND CHUCK SCHUMER ALL AGREE THAT
  • CHUCK SCHUMER ALL AGREE THAT THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED,
  • THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED, THE PRESIDENT JUST WALKED OUT,
  • THE PRESIDENT JUST WALKED OUT, BUT THEY INSIST THAT IT WASN’T A
  • BUT THEY INSIST THAT IT WASN’T A TEMPER TANTRUM BECAUSE THEY SAY,
  • TEMPER TANTRUM BECAUSE THEY SAY, THEY INSIST THAT THE PRESIDENT
  • THEY INSIST THAT THE PRESIDENT SPOKE VERY POLITELY.
  • SPOKE VERY POLITELY. ACCORDING TO A CONGRESSIONAL
  • ACCORDING TO A CONGRESSIONAL AIDE WHO DESCRIBED THE MEETING
  • AIDE WHO DESCRIBED THE MEETING TO NBC, AT ONE POINT SENATOR
  • TO NBC, AT ONE POINT SENATOR SCHUMER ASKED THE PRESIDENT,
  • SCHUMER ASKED THE PRESIDENT, "WHY WON’T YOU OPEN THE
  • "WHY WON’T YOU OPEN THE GOVERNMENT AND STOP HURTING
  • GOVERNMENT AND STOP HURTING PEOPLE?"
  • PEOPLE?" TO WHICH DONALD TRUMP RESPONDED,
  • TO WHICH DONALD TRUMP RESPONDED, "BECAUSE THEN YOU WON’T GIVE ME
  • "BECAUSE THEN YOU WON’T GIVE ME WHAT I WANT."
  • WHAT I WANT." CHUCK SCHUMER AND NANCY PELOSI
  • CHUCK SCHUMER AND NANCY PELOSI SEEMED CONVINCED THAT DONALD
  • SEEMED CONVINCED THAT DONALD TRUMP DOES NOT KNOW THAT 800,000
  • TRUMP DOES NOT KNOW THAT 800,000 FEDERAL WORKERS WHO ARE NOT
  • FEDERAL WORKERS WHO ARE NOT RECEIVING THEIR PAYCHECKS ARE
  • RECEIVING THEIR PAYCHECKS ARE ACTUALLY HAVING A HARD TIME.
  • ACTUALLY HAVING A HARD TIME. >> THE PRESIDENT SEEMS TO BE
  • >> THE PRESIDENT SEEMS TO BE INSENSITIVE TO THAT.
  • INSENSITIVE TO THAT. HE THINKS MAYBE THEY CAN JUST
  • HE THINKS MAYBE THEY CAN JUST ASK THEIR FATHER FOR MORE MONEY.
  • ASK THEIR FATHER FOR MORE MONEY. BUT THEY CAN’T.
  • BUT THEY CAN’T. BUT THEY CAN’T.
  • BUT THEY CAN’T. IF YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND THE
  • IF YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND THE NATIONAL INSECURITY, THEN YOU
  • NATIONAL INSECURITY, THEN YOU WOULD HAVE A POLICY THAT TAKES
  • WOULD HAVE A POLICY THAT TAKES PRIDE IN SAYING I’M GOING TO
  • PRIDE IN SAYING I’M GOING TO KEEP GOVERNMENT SHUT DOWN FOR
  • KEEP GOVERNMENT SHUT DOWN FOR MONTHS OR YEARS.
  • MONTHS OR YEARS. UNLESS YOU TOTALLY AGREE TO MY
  • UNLESS YOU TOTALLY AGREE TO MY POSITION.
  • POSITION. >> PRIOR TO THE MEETING WITH
  • >> PRIOR TO THE MEETING WITH NANCY PELOSI AND CHUCK SCHUMER
  • NANCY PELOSI AND CHUCK SCHUMER AT THE WHITE HOUSE, THE
  • AT THE WHITE HOUSE, THE PRESIDENT HAD A LUNCHEON MEETING
  • PRESIDENT HAD A LUNCHEON MEETING IN THE SENATE WITH REPUBLICAN
  • IN THE SENATE WITH REPUBLICAN SENATORS, AND EVEN THAT MEETING
  • SENATORS, AND EVEN THAT MEETING DIDN’T GO WELL BECAUSE WHILE THE
  • DIDN’T GO WELL BECAUSE WHILE THE DEMOCRATS ARE COMPLETELY,
  • DEMOCRATS ARE COMPLETELY, TOTALLY UNIFIED BEHIND THEIR
  • TOTALLY UNIFIED BEHIND THEIR LEADERSHIP IN THE HOUSE AND THE
  • LEADERSHIP IN THE HOUSE AND THE SENATE ON THIS ISSUE,
  • SENATE ON THIS ISSUE, REPUBLICANS ARE NOT.
  • REPUBLICANS ARE NOT. THERE ARE NOW AT LEAST 12
  • THERE ARE NOW AT LEAST 12 REPUBLICANS WHO HAVE PUBLICLY
  • REPUBLICANS WHO HAVE PUBLICLY SPLIT WITH THE PRESIDENT AND
  • SPLIT WITH THE PRESIDENT AND SUPPORT THE BILLS THAT SPEAKER
  • SUPPORT THE BILLS THAT SPEAKER PELOSI PASSED IN THE HOUSE OF
  • PELOSI PASSED IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES LAST WEEK.
  • REPRESENTATIVES LAST WEEK. EIGHT REPUBLICANS IN THE HOUSE
  • EIGHT REPUBLICANS IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ARE
  • OF REPRESENTATIVES ARE SUPPORTING THE PELOSI POSITION
  • SUPPORTING THE PELOSI POSITION AND AT LEAST FOUR REPUBLICAN
  • AND AT LEAST FOUR REPUBLICAN SENATORS ARE SUPPORTING THE
  • SENATORS ARE SUPPORTING THE PELOSI POSITION, WHICH MEANS NOW
  • PELOSI POSITION, WHICH MEANS NOW A MAJORITY OF THE U.S. SENATE,
  • A MAJORITY OF THE U.S. SENATE, 51 SENATORS, SUPPORT THE PELOSI
  • 51 SENATORS, SUPPORT THE PELOSI BILLS TO RE-OPEN THE GOVERNMENT
  • BILLS TO RE-OPEN THE GOVERNMENT AT THE BEGINNING -- AND AT THE
  • AT THE BEGINNING -- AND AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS STORY A FEW
  • BEGINNING OF THIS STORY A FEW WEEKS AGO, THOSE BILLS ACTUALLY
  • WEEKS AGO, THOSE BILLS ACTUALLY PASSED THE UNITED STATES SENATE
  • PASSED THE UNITED STATES SENATE UNANIMOUSLY.
  • UNANIMOUSLY. AND SO IT SHOULD NOT BE
  • AND SO IT SHOULD NOT BE SURPRISING NOW THAT AT LEAST
  • SURPRISING NOW THAT AT LEAST FOUR REPUBLICAN SENATORS WHO
  • FOUR REPUBLICAN SENATORS WHO VOTED FOR THOSE BILLS BEFORE
  • VOTED FOR THOSE BILLS BEFORE WHEN PRESIDENT TRUMP SAID HE
  • WHEN PRESIDENT TRUMP SAID HE WOULD SIGN THOSE BILLS, BEFORE
  • WOULD SIGN THOSE BILLS, BEFORE CHANGING HIS MIND, THAT AT LEAST
  • CHANGING HIS MIND, THAT AT LEAST FOUR OF THOSE REPUBLICAN
  • FOUR OF THOSE REPUBLICAN SENATORS ARE NOW IN FAVOR OF
  • SENATORS ARE NOW IN FAVOR OF THOSE BILLS AGAIN, AND IT COULD
  • THOSE BILLS AGAIN, AND IT COULD BE MANY MORE.
  • BE MANY MORE. THERE COULD BE OTHER REPUBLICAN
  • THERE COULD BE OTHER REPUBLICAN SENATORS WHO SIMPLY AREN’T
  • SENATORS WHO SIMPLY AREN’T SAYING SO PUBLICLY BUT WOULD BE
  • SAYING SO PUBLICLY BUT WOULD BE READY FOR VOTE FOR THOSE BILLS
  • READY FOR VOTE FOR THOSE BILLS IF THEY CAME TO A VOTE IN THE
  • IF THEY CAME TO A VOTE IN THE SENATE.
  • SENATE. AND SO THE PRESIDENT’S TRIP TO
  • AND SO THE PRESIDENT’S TRIP TO THE SENATE TODAY, WHICH IS AN
  • THE SENATE TODAY, WHICH IS AN EXTREMELY RARE THING FOR A
  • EXTREMELY RARE THING FOR A PRESIDENT TO DO, WAS A DESPERATE
  • PRESIDENT TO DO, WAS A DESPERATE MOVE TO TRY TO HOLD REPUBLICAN
  • MOVE TO TRY TO HOLD REPUBLICAN SENATORS IN LINE AGAINST THE
  • SENATORS IN LINE AGAINST THE PELOSI BILLS, AND IT’S NOT
  • PELOSI BILLS, AND IT’S NOT WORKING.
  • WORKING. BUT TO HEAR DONALD TRUMP
  • BUT TO HEAR DONALD TRUMP DESCRIBE THE MEETING WITH
  • DESCRIBE THE MEETING WITH REPUBLICAN SENATORS, YOU WOULD
  • REPUBLICAN SENATORS, YOU WOULD THINK THAT REPUBLICAN SENATORS
  • THINK THAT REPUBLICAN SENATORS ARE TOTALLY UNIFIED ON THIS.
  • ARE TOTALLY UNIFIED ON THIS. AND YOU WOULD HAVE NO IDEA THAT
  • AND YOU WOULD HAVE NO IDEA THAT FOUR REPUBLICAN SENATORS HAVE
  • FOUR REPUBLICAN SENATORS HAVE ALREADY MOVED OVER TO THE
  • ALREADY MOVED OVER TO THE DEMOCRATS’ POSITION PUBLICLY.
  • DEMOCRATS’ POSITION PUBLICLY. AND DONALD TRUMP KNOWS THAT THE
  • AND DONALD TRUMP KNOWS THAT THE REPUBLICAN SENATORS ARE NOT
  • REPUBLICAN SENATORS ARE NOT TOTALLY UNIFIED ON THIS, AND
  • TOTALLY UNIFIED ON THIS, AND THAT IS EXACTLY WHY HE HAD TO
  • THAT IS EXACTLY WHY HE HAD TO MAKE THAT TRIP TO TALK TO THE
  • MAKE THAT TRIP TO TALK TO THE REPUBLICAN SENATORS AT THEIR
  • REPUBLICAN SENATORS AT THEIR LUNCHEON TODAY, TO TRY TO HOLD
  • LUNCHEON TODAY, TO TRY TO HOLD THEM TOGETHER.
  • THEM TOGETHER. EVERY REPORTER WAITING TO SPEAK
  • EVERY REPORTER WAITING TO SPEAK TO THE PRESIDENT AFTER THAT
  • TO THE PRESIDENT AFTER THAT LUNCHEON KNOWS ALL OF THAT.
  • LUNCHEON KNOWS ALL OF THAT. THEY KNOW THE REPUBLICANS ARE
  • THEY KNOW THE REPUBLICANS ARE NOT TOTALLY UNIFIED, BUT DONALD
  • NOT TOTALLY UNIFIED, BUT DONALD TRUMP TRIED TO TELL THEM THAT
  • TRUMP TRIED TO TELL THEM THAT THE REPUBLICANS ARE TOTALLY
  • THE REPUBLICANS ARE TOTALLY UNIFIED.
  • UNIFIED. >> DID ANY REPUBLICANS IN THAT
  • >> DID ANY REPUBLICANS IN THAT MEETING TODAY TELL YOU THEY WANT
  • MEETING TODAY TELL YOU THEY WANT YOU TO PURSUE A DIFFERENT
  • YOU TO PURSUE A DIFFERENT STRATEGY, THEY WANT YOU TO
  • STRATEGY, THEY WANT YOU TO RE-OPEN THE GOVERNMENT?
  • RE-OPEN THE GOVERNMENT? >> A COUPLE TALKED ABOUT --
  • >> A COUPLE TALKED ABOUT -- YEAH, A COUPLE TALKED ABOUT
  • YEAH, A COUPLE TALKED ABOUT STRATEGY BUT THEY’RE WITH US ALL
  • STRATEGY BUT THEY’RE WITH US ALL THE WAY.
  • THE WAY. THEY’RE WITH US.
  • THEY’RE WITH US. >> MR. PRESIDENT, WHAT ABOUT THE
  • >> MR. PRESIDENT, WHAT ABOUT THE IDEA THAT --
  • IDEA THAT -- >> I JUST WANT -- THE FAKE NEWS
  • >> I JUST WANT -- THE FAKE NEWS AND THE FAKE NEWS, AND I JUST
  • AND THE FAKE NEWS, AND I JUST WANT TO TELL YOU THAT THE
  • WANT TO TELL YOU THAT THE REPUBLICANS ARE TOTALLY UNIFIED.
  • REPUBLICANS ARE TOTALLY UNIFIED. >> TOTALLY UNIFIED.
  • >> TOTALLY UNIFIED. ALASKA REPUBLICAN SENATOR LISA
  • ALASKA REPUBLICAN SENATOR LISA MURKOWSKI WAS IN THE MEETING.
  • MURKOWSKI WAS IN THE MEETING. YESTERDAY SHE BECAME THE THIRD
  • YESTERDAY SHE BECAME THE THIRD OF THE FOUR REPUBLICAN SENATORS
  • OF THE FOUR REPUBLICAN SENATORS TO DEFECT FROM THE TRUMP
  • TO DEFECT FROM THE TRUMP POSITION.
  • POSITION. SHE IS OPPOSED TO THE TRUMP
  • SHE IS OPPOSED TO THE TRUMP POSITION.
  • POSITION. HERE’S WHAT SENATOR MURKOWSKI
  • HERE’S WHAT SENATOR MURKOWSKI TOLD REPORTERS AFTER THAT
  • TOLD REPORTERS AFTER THAT MEETING WITH THE PRESIDENT
  • MEETING WITH THE PRESIDENT TODAY.
  • TODAY. >> I WISH THAT THERE HAD BEEN
  • >> I WISH THAT THERE HAD BEEN MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR QUESTION
  • MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR QUESTION AND ANSWER, BUT, YOU KNOW, THE
  • AND ANSWER, BUT, YOU KNOW, THE PRESIDENT WAS VERY CLEAR IN WHAT
  • PRESIDENT WAS VERY CLEAR IN WHAT HE WAS ASKING FOR, WHICH WAS
  • HE WAS ASKING FOR, WHICH WAS UNITY FROM THE REPUBLICANS.
  • UNITY FROM THE REPUBLICANS. I REITERATED THAT I THOUGHT THAT
  • I REITERATED THAT I THOUGHT THAT THERE WAS UNITY WHEN IT CAME TO
  • THERE WAS UNITY WHEN IT CAME TO SUPPORTING OUR NATIONAL SECURITY
  • SUPPORTING OUR NATIONAL SECURITY AND PROVIDING FOR SECURE
  • AND PROVIDING FOR SECURE BORDERS, AS WELL AS TO DEAL WITH
  • BORDERS, AS WELL AS TO DEAL WITH THE HUMANITARIAN CRISIS, BUT I
  • THE HUMANITARIAN CRISIS, BUT I DID SUGGEST THAT THERE WAS SOME
  • DID SUGGEST THAT THERE WAS SOME SEPARATION IN TERMS OF HOW LONG
  • SEPARATION IN TERMS OF HOW LONG THE SHUTDOWN WOULD CONTINUE,
  • THE SHUTDOWN WOULD CONTINUE, THAT FOLKS ARE IMPACTED WHETHER
  • THAT FOLKS ARE IMPACTED WHETHER THEY’RE IN THE STATE OF ALASKA
  • THEY’RE IN THE STATE OF ALASKA OR WHEREVER AROUND THE COUNTRY.
  • OR WHEREVER AROUND THE COUNTRY. >> MAYBE NO ONE IN THE ROOM
  • >> MAYBE NO ONE IN THE ROOM TRANSLATED THAT FOR DONALD
  • TRANSLATED THAT FOR DONALD TRUMP.
  • TRUMP. LISA MURKOWSKI IS SAYING THAT,
  • LISA MURKOWSKI IS SAYING THAT, SURE, THERE’S REPUBLICAN UNITY
  • SURE, THERE’S REPUBLICAN UNITY ON POLICY, BUT THERE IS NO UNITY
  • ON POLICY, BUT THERE IS NO UNITY ON THE SHUTDOWN.
  • ON THE SHUTDOWN. LISA MURKOWSKI DOES NOT WANT THE
  • LISA MURKOWSKI DOES NOT WANT THE SHUTDOWN TO CONTINUE, AND SO SHE
  • SHUTDOWN TO CONTINUE, AND SO SHE WANTS TO FUND THE GOVERNMENT NOW
  • WANTS TO FUND THE GOVERNMENT NOW AND FIGHT ABOUT THE WALL LATER.
  • AND FIGHT ABOUT THE WALL LATER. >> WERE YOU HAPPY WITH HOW THE
  • >> WERE YOU HAPPY WITH HOW THE MEETING WENT?
  • MEETING WENT? >> THE MEETING WITH THE
  • >> THE MEETING WITH THE PRESIDENT?
  • PRESIDENT? >> MMM-HMM.
  • >> MMM-HMM. >> I WISH THAT WE HAD HAD A
  • >> I WISH THAT WE HAD HAD A LITTLE MORE CLEAR DIRECTION AS
  • LITTLE MORE CLEAR DIRECTION AS TO HOW WE’RE GOING TO GET THERE.
  • TO HOW WE’RE GOING TO GET THERE. >> THAT IS THE POLITE PUBLIC,
  • >> THAT IS THE POLITE PUBLIC, SENATORIAL LANGUAGE FOR WHAT
  • SENATORIAL LANGUAGE FOR WHAT THAT UNNAMED REPUBLICAN CALLED
  • THAT UNNAMED REPUBLICAN CALLED TOTAL CHAOS.
  • TOTAL CHAOS. JOINING OUR DISCUSSION NOW, JOHN
  • JOINING OUR DISCUSSION NOW, JOHN HEILEMANN, NATIONAL AFFAIRS
  • HEILEMANN, NATIONAL AFFAIRS ANALYST FOR NBC NEWS AND --
  • ANALYST FOR NBC NEWS AND -- CO-HOST AND EXECUTIVE PRODUCE OF
  • CO-HOST AND EXECUTIVE PRODUCE OF SHOWTIME’S THE CIRCUS.
  • SHOWTIME’S THE CIRCUS. CHARLIE SYKES IS WITH US.
  • CHARLIE SYKES IS WITH US. AND MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST SAM
  • AND MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST SAM STEIN, THE POLITICS EDITOR OF
  • STEIN, THE POLITICS EDITOR OF "THE DAILY BEAST."
  • "THE DAILY BEAST." HE’S ALSO AN MSNBC POLITICAL
  • HE’S ALSO AN MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST.
  • ANALYST. CHARLIE, I’M SORRY, THAT IN THE
  • CHARLIE, I’M SORRY, THAT IN THE TELEPROMPTER WAS THE FIRST TIME
  • TELEPROMPTER WAS THE FIRST TIME THAT I LEARNED THAT YOU ARE
  • THAT I LEARNED THAT YOU ARE RUNNING SOMETHING CALLED THE
  • RUNNING SOMETHING CALLED THE BULWARK, WHICH WE WIND WHERE?
  • BULWARK, WHICH WE WIND WHERE? IS THAT ONLINE?
  • IS THAT ONLINE? >> THAT IS ONLINE.
  • >> THAT IS ONLINE. A LOT OF THE STAFFERS FROM "THE
  • A LOT OF THE STAFFERS FROM "THE WEEKLY STANDARD" ARE THERE.
  • WEEKLY STANDARD" ARE THERE. >> ALL RIGHT.
  • >> ALL RIGHT. WE JUST DID THE FULL PROMO ON
  • WE JUST DID THE FULL PROMO ON IT.
  • IT. JOHN HEILEMANN, DONALD TRUMP
  • JOHN HEILEMANN, DONALD TRUMP COMES OUT OF A MEETING WITH
  • COMES OUT OF A MEETING WITH REPUBLICANS WHERE EVERYONE IN
  • REPUBLICANS WHERE EVERYONE IN THE WORLD KNOWS THAT REPUBLICANS
  • THE WORLD KNOWS THAT REPUBLICANS ARE NOT TOTALLY UNIFIED.
  • ARE NOT TOTALLY UNIFIED. IF THEY WERE TOTALLY UNIFIED,
  • IF THEY WERE TOTALLY UNIFIED, DONALD TRUMP WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN
  • DONALD TRUMP WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN RUNNING UP TO THE SENATE TODAY
  • RUNNING UP TO THE SENATE TODAY TRYING TO MAKE THEM UNIFIED.
  • TRYING TO MAKE THEM UNIFIED. >> YES.
  • >> YES. THE PRESENCE OF DONALD TRUMP ON
  • THE PRESENCE OF DONALD TRUMP ON CAPITOL HILL AT LUNCH, SAYING
  • CAPITOL HILL AT LUNCH, SAYING THAT THE REPUBLICANS ARE
  • THAT THE REPUBLICANS ARE UNIFIED, WAS THE BEST EVIDENCE
  • UNIFIED, WAS THE BEST EVIDENCE THAT, IN FACT, THE REPUBLICANS
  • THAT, IN FACT, THE REPUBLICANS ARE NOT, IN FACT, UNIFIED.
  • ARE NOT, IN FACT, UNIFIED. OF COURSE IF THE REPUBLICANS
  • OF COURSE IF THE REPUBLICANS WERE UNIFIED, THE WHOLE WORLD
  • WERE UNIFIED, THE WHOLE WORLD WOULD BE DIFFERENT, BUT AS WE
  • WOULD BE DIFFERENT, BUT AS WE SAW LAST NIGHT, ONE OF THE
  • SAW LAST NIGHT, ONE OF THE THINGS, YOU KNOW, BEFORE THE
  • THINGS, YOU KNOW, BEFORE THE SPEECH AND YOU COVERED IT VERY
  • SPEECH AND YOU COVERED IT VERY WELL LAST NIGHT, LAWRENCE, BUT
  • WELL LAST NIGHT, LAWRENCE, BUT ONE OF THE THINGS YOU NOTED,
  • ONE OF THE THINGS YOU NOTED, WHICH WAS -- WHICH WAS TRUE, YOU
  • WHICH WAS -- WHICH WAS TRUE, YOU KNOW, TRUMP CONFESSING TO THOSE
  • KNOW, TRUMP CONFESSING TO THOSE REPORTERS BEFORE THE SPEECH THAT
  • REPORTERS BEFORE THE SPEECH THAT NOTHING WOULD CHANGE ON THE
  • NOTHING WOULD CHANGE ON THE BASIS OF THE SPEECH, WHICH IS
  • BASIS OF THE SPEECH, WHICH IS WHY HE DIDN’T WANT TO GIVE IT.
  • WHY HE DIDN’T WANT TO GIVE IT. TRUMP HAS HAD VERY FEW MOMENTS
  • TRUMP HAS HAD VERY FEW MOMENTS OF GREAT CLARITY IN HIS MENTAL
  • OF GREAT CLARITY IN HIS MENTAL STATE SUCH AS IT IS, BUT THAT
  • STATE SUCH AS IT IS, BUT THAT ONE HE WAS RIGHT ABOUT.
  • ONE HE WAS RIGHT ABOUT. HE WAS RIGHT THE POLITICS WERE
  • HE WAS RIGHT THE POLITICS WERE AGAINST HIM, THE POLICY IS
  • AGAINST HIM, THE POLICY IS AGAINST HIM.
  • AGAINST HIM. THE COUNTRY IS AGAINST HIM.
  • THE COUNTRY IS AGAINST HIM. THE DEMOCRATS ARE UNIFIED
  • THE DEMOCRATS ARE UNIFIED AGAINST HIM AND HIS PARTY IS
  • AGAINST HIM AND HIS PARTY IS STARTING TO TURN AGAINST HIM
  • STARTING TO TURN AGAINST HIM SLOWLY BUT INEVITABILITY.
  • SLOWLY BUT INEVITABILITY. HE KNEW THE SPEECH WASN’T GOING
  • HE KNEW THE SPEECH WASN’T GOING TO ACCOMPLISH ANYTHING.
  • TO ACCOMPLISH ANYTHING. SO TODAY EVERYTHING THAT
  • SO TODAY EVERYTHING THAT UNFOLDED I THINK, AGAIN, TRUMP
  • UNFOLDED I THINK, AGAIN, TRUMP RARELY CLEAR, RARELY LUCID, BUT
  • RARELY CLEAR, RARELY LUCID, BUT I THINK HE SAW BACK AS FAR AS
  • I THINK HE SAW BACK AS FAR AS YESTERDAY AFTERNOON THAT HE WAS
  • YESTERDAY AFTERNOON THAT HE WAS GOING TO BE IN THIS SITUATION
  • GOING TO BE IN THIS SITUATION WHERE HE WAS GOING TO GIVE A
  • WHERE HE WAS GOING TO GIVE A SPEECH THAT WAS GOING TO HAVE NO
  • SPEECH THAT WAS GOING TO HAVE NO EFFECT WHATSOEVER AND HE WAS
  • EFFECT WHATSOEVER AND HE WAS GOING TO HAVE TO SPEND TODAY
  • GOING TO HAVE TO SPEND TODAY LYING ABOUT THE FACT THAT HIS
  • LYING ABOUT THE FACT THAT HIS SPEECH HAD A PROFOUND EFFECT ON
  • SPEECH HAD A PROFOUND EFFECT ON THE UNITY OF HIS PARTY.
  • THE UNITY OF HIS PARTY. >> CHARLIE, IT HAD NO EFFECT ON
  • >> CHARLIE, IT HAD NO EFFECT ON NANCY PELOSI WHO HAS A VERY
  • NANCY PELOSI WHO HAS A VERY SIMPLE ONE-WORD NEGOTIATING
  • SIMPLE ONE-WORD NEGOTIATING POSITION WITH DONALD TRUMP ON
  • POSITION WITH DONALD TRUMP ON THE WALL, AND THAT WORD IS NO.
  • THE WALL, AND THAT WORD IS NO. >> YEAH, AND APPARENTLY THE
  • >> YEAH, AND APPARENTLY THE AUTHOR OF -- OR THE GUY WHO
  • AUTHOR OF -- OR THE GUY WHO CLAIMED TO BE THE AUTHOR OF "ART
  • CLAIMED TO BE THE AUTHOR OF "ART OF THE DEAL" DOESN’T KNOW HOW TO
  • OF THE DEAL" DOESN’T KNOW HOW TO HANDLE THAT.
  • HANDLE THAT. THIS IS A VERY DIFFICULT
  • THIS IS A VERY DIFFICULT POSITION FOR THE REPUBLICANS.
  • POSITION FOR THE REPUBLICANS. IT USED TO BE IF THEY WERE
  • IT USED TO BE IF THEY WERE INVOLVED IN A GOVERNMENT
  • INVOLVED IN A GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN THEY WANTED TO SHRINK
  • SHUTDOWN THEY WANTED TO SHRINK THE SIZE OF GOVERNMENT.
  • THE SIZE OF GOVERNMENT. THEY CARED ABOUT THE SIZE OF THE
  • THEY CARED ABOUT THE SIZE OF THE DEFICIT.
  • DEFICIT. THEY WERE CONCERNED ABOUT THE
  • THEY WERE CONCERNED ABOUT THE DEBT.
  • DEBT. HERE THEY FIND THEMSELVES
  • HERE THEY FIND THEMSELVES PRESIDING OVER THIS CHAOS, THIS
  • PRESIDING OVER THIS CHAOS, THIS CLUSTER IN THE CAUSE OF SPENDING
  • CLUSTER IN THE CAUSE OF SPENDING MORE MONEY, INCREASING MONEY,
  • MORE MONEY, INCREASING MONEY, SPENDING MONEY ON A MEDIEVAL
  • SPENDING MONEY ON A MEDIEVAL BOONDOGGLE, AND THINK ABOUT, YOU
  • BOONDOGGLE, AND THINK ABOUT, YOU KNOW, I MEAN, HAVING RAILED
  • KNOW, I MEAN, HAVING RAILED ABOUT GOVERNMENT OVERREACH FOR
  • ABOUT GOVERNMENT OVERREACH FOR YEARS, SITTING IN THE ROOM WITH
  • YEARS, SITTING IN THE ROOM WITH THE PRESIDENT WHO IS THREATENING
  • THE PRESIDENT WHO IS THREATENING TO THE CLAIRE A
  • TO THE CLAIRE A TO DECLARE A NATIONAL EMERGENCY.
  • TO DECLARE A NATIONAL EMERGENCY. THINK ABOUT WHAT THAT MUST SOUND
  • THINK ABOUT WHAT THAT MUST SOUND LIKE TO CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS
  • LIKE TO CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS WHO CLAIM TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT
  • WHO CLAIM TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT THE RULE OF LAW AND
  • THE RULE OF LAW AND CONSTITUTIONAL BALANCE BETWEEN
  • CONSTITUTIONAL BALANCE BETWEEN THE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT.
  • THE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT. >> I ASSUME THAT THE PRESIDENT
  • >> I ASSUME THAT THE PRESIDENT KNEW EXACTLY WHAT HE WAS GOING
  • KNEW EXACTLY WHAT HE WAS GOING TO DO AS SOON AS HE HEARD THE NO
  • TO DO AS SOON AS HE HEARD THE NO FROM NANCY PELOSI THAT HE KNEW
  • FROM NANCY PELOSI THAT HE KNEW HE WAS GOING TO HEAR, AND THE
  • HE WAS GOING TO HEAR, AND THE BEST HE FIGURED HE HAD TODAY
  • BEST HE FIGURED HE HAD TODAY WAS, I’LL GO OUT AND I’LL TWEET
  • WAS, I’LL GO OUT AND I’LL TWEET THAT I WALKED OUT ON NANCY
  • THAT I WALKED OUT ON NANCY PELOSI AND RUSH LIMBAUGH’S GONNA
  • PELOSI AND RUSH LIMBAUGH’S GONNA LOVE THAT.
  • LOVE THAT. >> YES, THAT’S SORT OF PRO TOE
  • >> YES, THAT’S SORT OF PRO TOE TYPICAL TRUMP STAGECRAFT HOIP..
  • TYPICAL TRUMP STAGECRAFT HOIP.. PART OF WHAT HE’S TRYING TO DO
  • PART OF WHAT HE’S TRYING TO DO IS AT LEAST SHOW THERE IS SOME
  • IS AT LEAST SHOW THERE IS SOME TALK OR PROGRESS HAPPENING FROM
  • TALK OR PROGRESS HAPPENING FROM HIS VANTAGE POINT.
  • HIS VANTAGE POINT. HE HAS TO AT LEAST SHOW THAT
  • HE HAS TO AT LEAST SHOW THAT THINGS ARE MOVING, WHETHER
  • THINGS ARE MOVING, WHETHER THEY’RE MOVING IN A DIRECTION OR
  • THEY’RE MOVING IN A DIRECTION OR COMPROMISE OR AGITATION OR
  • COMPROMISE OR AGITATION OR CONFRONTATION, THEY HAVE TO BE
  • CONFRONTATION, THEY HAVE TO BE MOVING, OTHERWISE THE FOCUS
  • MOVING, OTHERWISE THE FOCUS COMES SQUARELY ON HIM.
  • COMES SQUARELY ON HIM. SO CALLING PEOPLE UP TO THE
  • SO CALLING PEOPLE UP TO THE WHITE HOUSE WHEN YOU KNOW THE
  • WHITE HOUSE WHEN YOU KNOW THE OUTCOME IS SOMETHING THAT HE HAS
  • OUTCOME IS SOMETHING THAT HE HAS TO DO.
  • TO DO. I WILL SAY THIS, THOUGH, WE’RE
  • I WILL SAY THIS, THOUGH, WE’RE PUTTING A PREPONDERANCE OF
  • PUTTING A PREPONDERANCE OF ATTENTION ON TRUMP AND PELOSI.
  • ATTENTION ON TRUMP AND PELOSI. AT THE TOP OF YOUR MONOLOGUE,
  • AT THE TOP OF YOUR MONOLOGUE, YOU MADE A VALID POINT, THE
  • YOU MADE A VALID POINT, THE CONGRESSIONAL LEADERS HOLD AN
  • CONGRESSIONAL LEADERS HOLD AN IMMENSE AMOUNT OF POWER IN THIS
  • IMMENSE AMOUNT OF POWER IN THIS NEGOTIATION.
  • NEGOTIATION. PELOSI IS JUST ONE OF TWO.
  • PELOSI IS JUST ONE OF TWO. THE OTHER IS MITCH McCONNELL.
  • THE OTHER IS MITCH McCONNELL. AT ANY MOMENT IN TIME MITCH
  • AT ANY MOMENT IN TIME MITCH McCONNELL CAN JUST SAY, I’VE HAD
  • McCONNELL CAN JUST SAY, I’VE HAD ENOUGH OF THIS AND I’LL LET IT
  • ENOUGH OF THIS AND I’LL LET IT GO TO THE FLOOR AND I WILL
  • GO TO THE FLOOR AND I WILL LIKELY GET ENOUGH VOTES TO
  • LIKELY GET ENOUGH VOTES TO OVERRIDE A PRESIDENTIAL VETO AND
  • OVERRIDE A PRESIDENTIAL VETO AND WE’LL BE DONE WITH THIS.
  • WE’LL BE DONE WITH THIS. MITCH McCONNELL HAS NOTABLY
  • MITCH McCONNELL HAS NOTABLY STAYED VERY FAR AWAY FROM THE
  • STAYED VERY FAR AWAY FROM THE DEBATE.
  • DEBATE. WHAT I THOUGHT WAS THE MOST
  • WHAT I THOUGHT WAS THE MOST INTERESTING ELEMENT TODAY WAS
  • INTERESTING ELEMENT TODAY WAS NOT TRUMP GETTING UP AND WALKING
  • NOT TRUMP GETTING UP AND WALKING OUT ON NANCY PELOSI, I THOUGHT
  • OUT ON NANCY PELOSI, I THOUGHT IT WAS MITCH McCONNELL YET AGAIN
  • IT WAS MITCH McCONNELL YET AGAIN NOT GOING OUT WITH REPUBLICANS
  • NOT GOING OUT WITH REPUBLICANS AFTER THAT CONFRONTATION TO TALK
  • AFTER THAT CONFRONTATION TO TALK TO THE CAMERAS BECAUSE HE REALLY
  • TO THE CAMERAS BECAUSE HE REALLY CLEARLY WANTS NO PART OF THIS
  • CLEARLY WANTS NO PART OF THIS NEGOTIATION.
  • NEGOTIATION. >> THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT I WAS
  • >> THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT I WAS SEEING IN THOSE -- WHEN THEY
  • SEEING IN THOSE -- WHEN THEY WEBSITE OUT
  • WEBSITE OUT WENT OUT TO THE CAMERAS
  • WENT OUT TO THE CAMERAS AFTERWARDS, NO MITCH McCONNELL.
  • AFTERWARDS, NO MITCH McCONNELL. THAT’S WHAT I WAS SEEING THERE.
  • THAT’S WHAT I WAS SEEING THERE. JOHN HEILEMANN, SAM IS SO RIGHT
  • JOHN HEILEMANN, SAM IS SO RIGHT ABOUT HOW IMPORTANT THAT IS.
  • ABOUT HOW IMPORTANT THAT IS. McCONNELL HAS BEEN VERY CAREFUL
  • McCONNELL HAS BEEN VERY CAREFUL IN HIS LANGUAGE.
  • IN HIS LANGUAGE. PEOPLE ARE REPORTING TO HAVE
  • PEOPLE ARE REPORTING TO HAVE SAID -- TO SAY REPEATEDLY HE
  • SAID -- TO SAY REPEATEDLY HE WILL NOT BRING UP A BILL UNLESS.
  • WILL NOT BRING UP A BILL UNLESS. HE’S NOT SAYING THAT.
  • HE’S NOT SAYING THAT. HE’S SAYING THINGS LIKE IT’S NOT
  • HE’S SAYING THINGS LIKE IT’S NOT REALISTIC TO BRING UP.
  • REALISTIC TO BRING UP. IT COULD BE REALISTIC TOMORROW
  • IT COULD BE REALISTIC TOMORROW AFTERNOON OR IT COULD BE
  • AFTERNOON OR IT COULD BE REALISTIC MONDAY, SO MITCH
  • REALISTIC MONDAY, SO MITCH McCONNELL’S LANGUAGE IN
  • McCONNELL’S LANGUAGE IN EVERYTHING I SEE HIM SAY LEAVES
  • EVERYTHING I SEE HIM SAY LEAVES HIM THE OPENING THAT AS SAM
  • HIM THE OPENING THAT AS SAM SUGGESTS COULD COME AT ANY
  • SUGGESTS COULD COME AT ANY MOMENT WHERE THERE’S ENOUGH
  • MOMENT WHERE THERE’S ENOUGH REPUBLICAN SUPPORT IN THE SENATE
  • REPUBLICAN SUPPORT IN THE SENATE WHERE HE JUST MOVES AND ENDS
  • WHERE HE JUST MOVES AND ENDS THIS THING.
  • THIS THING. AND THERE’S -- IN ADDITION TO
  • AND THERE’S -- IN ADDITION TO THE FACT THAT MITCH McCONNELL
  • THE FACT THAT MITCH McCONNELL HAD NOTHING TO SAY PUBLICLY
  • HAD NOTHING TO SAY PUBLICLY OUTSIDE THE WHITE HOUSE, THERE
  • OUTSIDE THE WHITE HOUSE, THERE IS A REPORT INDICATING HE HAS
  • IS A REPORT INDICATING HE HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO SAY IN THE
  • ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO SAY IN THE ROOM WHEN THE PRESIDENT WAS IN
  • ROOM WHEN THE PRESIDENT WAS IN THE ROOM TALKING TO CHUCK
  • THE ROOM TALKING TO CHUCK SCHUMER AND NANCY PELOSI, AND
  • SCHUMER AND NANCY PELOSI, AND THAT’S JUST INCONCEIVABLE.
  • THAT’S JUST INCONCEIVABLE. >> YES.
  • >> YES. >> THAT THE SENATE MAJORITY
  • >> THAT THE SENATE MAJORITY LEADER WOULD BE IN THE ROOM WITH
  • LEADER WOULD BE IN THE ROOM WITH THE SPEAKER AND THE PRESIDENT
  • THE SPEAKER AND THE PRESIDENT AND NOT SAY A WORD.
  • AND NOT SAY A WORD. >> WELL, I MEAN, LOOK, I THINK
  • >> WELL, I MEAN, LOOK, I THINK HE’S STILL OBVIOUSLY FEELING
  • HE’S STILL OBVIOUSLY FEELING BURNED BY THE WAY THE PRESIDENT
  • BURNED BY THE WAY THE PRESIDENT HAS HANDLED THIS ENTIRE THING
  • HAS HANDLED THIS ENTIRE THING AND DOESN’T WANT TO GET BURNED
  • AND DOESN’T WANT TO GET BURNED AGAIN.
  • AGAIN. BUT, LOOK, I MEAN, I DO THINK WE
  • BUT, LOOK, I MEAN, I DO THINK WE ARE COMING QUICKLY -- IF YOU
  • ARE COMING QUICKLY -- IF YOU LISTEN TO THE TEN OR OF THE
  • LISTEN TO THE TEN OR OF THE REPORTING THAT WAS COMING OUT
  • REPORTING THAT WAS COMING OUT FROM THE HILL OVER THE COURSE OF
  • FROM THE HILL OVER THE COURSE OF THIS DAY AND YOU STARTED TO HEAR
  • THIS DAY AND YOU STARTED TO HEAR REPUBLICANS, EVEN BEFORE THE
  • REPUBLICANS, EVEN BEFORE THE PELOSI AND SCHUMER MEETING WHERE
  • PELOSI AND SCHUMER MEETING WHERE TRUMP WALKED OUT, EVEN BEFORE
  • TRUMP WALKED OUT, EVEN BEFORE THAT, YOU WERE STARTING TO HEAR
  • THAT, YOU WERE STARTING TO HEAR THIS AIMIENT NOISE OF
  • THIS AIMIENT NOISE OF REPUBLICANS ON CAPITOL HILL SAY,
  • REPUBLICANS ON CAPITOL HILL SAY, WELL, THERE IS REALLY ONLY ONE
  • WELL, THERE IS REALLY ONLY ONE WAY OUT OF THIS.
  • WAY OUT OF THIS. THE ONLY WAY OUT IS FOR TRUMP TO
  • THE ONLY WAY OUT IS FOR TRUMP TO DECLARE A NATIONAL EMERGENCY.
  • DECLARE A NATIONAL EMERGENCY. AND THEN AFTER THE PELOSI
  • AND THEN AFTER THE PELOSI MEETING YOU HEARD THAT VOLUME
  • MEETING YOU HEARD THAT VOLUME WAS AMPLIFIED TO SOME EXTENT.
  • WAS AMPLIFIED TO SOME EXTENT. YOU’RE NOW STARTING TO HEAR FROM
  • YOU’RE NOW STARTING TO HEAR FROM REPUBLICANS, MOST OF THEM NOT ON
  • REPUBLICANS, MOST OF THEM NOT ON THE RECORD, BUT IT’S THE -- AS I
  • THE RECORD, BUT IT’S THE -- AS I SAID, THE AIMIENT NOISE IS ROBS
  • SAID, THE AIMIENT NOISE IS ROBS STARTING TO REALIZE THE ONLY WAY
  • STARTING TO REALIZE THE ONLY WAY OUT IS THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY.
  • OUT IS THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY. AND I DO THINK, LAWRENCE, THE
  • AND I DO THINK, LAWRENCE, THE POINT THAT YOU AND SAM BOTH JUST
  • POINT THAT YOU AND SAM BOTH JUST MADE THROWS INTO VERY STARK
  • MADE THROWS INTO VERY STARK RELIEF THE CHOICE THAT
  • RELIEF THE CHOICE THAT REPUBLICANS ARE GOING TO FACE IN
  • REPUBLICANS ARE GOING TO FACE IN THE COMING DAYS.
  • THE COMING DAYS. TRUMP IS CLEARLY MOVING IN THAT
  • TRUMP IS CLEARLY MOVING IN THAT DIRECTION, AND SO THE QUESTION
  • DIRECTION, AND SO THE QUESTION FOR THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IS
  • FOR THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IS GOING TO BE, ARE YOU GOING TO
  • GOING TO BE, ARE YOU GOING TO ACQUIESCE INTO THAT KIND OF
  • ACQUIESCE INTO THAT KIND OF ACTION, WHICH IS TRULY THE ACT
  • ACTION, WHICH IS TRULY THE ACT OF AN AUTOCRAT.
  • OF AN AUTOCRAT. ARE YOU GOING TO ACCEPT AND
  • ARE YOU GOING TO ACCEPT AND EMBRACE THE NOTION THAT THE ONLY
  • EMBRACE THE NOTION THAT THE ONLY WAY OUT IS A NATIONAL EMERGENCY
  • WAY OUT IS A NATIONAL EMERGENCY DECLARATION BY THE PRESIDENT
  • DECLARATION BY THE PRESIDENT WHERE HE USURPS ALL KINDS OF
  • WHERE HE USURPS ALL KINDS OF POWERS AND ACTS IN THIS KIND OF
  • POWERS AND ACTS IN THIS KIND OF UNPRECEDENTED -- NOT TOTALLY
  • UNPRECEDENTED -- NOT TOTALLY UNPRECEDENTED BUT CERTAINLY
  • UNPRECEDENTED BUT CERTAINLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL, EXTRA
  • UNCONSTITUTIONAL, EXTRA CONSTITUTIONAL WAY.
  • CONSTITUTIONAL WAY. OR ARE YOU GOING TO ACKNOWLEDGE
  • OR ARE YOU GOING TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THERE OF COURSE IS ANOTHER
  • THAT THERE OF COURSE IS ANOTHER WAY OUT AND THAT IS TO BEHAVE
  • WAY OUT AND THAT IS TO BEHAVE LIKE RESPONSIBLE LEGISLATORS AND
  • LIKE RESPONSIBLE LEGISLATORS AND TAKE THE VOTE YOU TOOK AGAIN A
  • TAKE THE VOTE YOU TOOK AGAIN A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO AND AS YOU
  • COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO AND AS YOU SAY WOULD PROBABLY PASS AT THIS
  • SAY WOULD PROBABLY PASS AT THIS POINT BY VETO-PROOF MARGINS.
  • POINT BY VETO-PROOF MARGINS. >> CHARLIE, POLLING
  • >> CHARLIE, POLLING OVERWHELMINGLY AGAINST PRESIDENT
  • OVERWHELMINGLY AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP AND REPUBLICANS ON THE
  • TRUMP AND REPUBLICANS ON THE SHUTDOWN.
  • SHUTDOWN. WE HAVE AN ECONOMIST POLL SAYING
  • WE HAVE AN ECONOMIST POLL SAYING WHO IS MOST TO BLAME FOR THE
  • WHO IS MOST TO BLAME FOR THE SHUTDOWN.
  • SHUTDOWN. OBVIOUSLY MOST PEOPLE SAY DONALD
  • OBVIOUSLY MOST PEOPLE SAY DONALD TRUMP, 50%.
  • TRUMP, 50%. ANOTHER 5% SAY REPUBLICANS.
  • ANOTHER 5% SAY REPUBLICANS. SO THERE YOU HAVE 55% WITH TRUMP
  • SO THERE YOU HAVE 55% WITH TRUMP AND THE REPUBLICANS.
  • AND THE REPUBLICANS. 32% DEMOCRATS.
  • 32% DEMOCRATS. AND THAT 32% DEMOCRATS IS REALLY
  • AND THAT 32% DEMOCRATS IS REALLY EVERY TRUMP VOTER IN THE COUNTRY
  • EVERY TRUMP VOTER IN THE COUNTRY AT THIS POINT.
  • AT THIS POINT. >> YEAH.
  • >> YEAH. >> PRESUMABLY.
  • >> PRESUMABLY. BUT, CHARLIE, TO JOHN’S POINT,
  • BUT, CHARLIE, TO JOHN’S POINT, THE EMERGENCY SAVES WEAK
  • THE EMERGENCY SAVES WEAK SENATORS FROM EXACTLY WHAT THEY
  • SENATORS FROM EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANT TO BE SAVED FROM, WHICH IS
  • WANT TO BE SAVED FROM, WHICH IS ANY KIND OF VOTE THAT IS
  • ANY KIND OF VOTE THAT IS AWKWARD.
  • AWKWARD. THE EMERGENCY THEY KNOW WOULD BE
  • THE EMERGENCY THEY KNOW WOULD BE IMMEDIATELY CHALLENGED IN COURT,
  • IMMEDIATELY CHALLENGED IN COURT, JUST LIKE THE TRUMP MUSLIM BAN,
  • JUST LIKE THE TRUMP MUSLIM BAN, PROBABLY GET AN INJUNCTION
  • PROBABLY GET AN INJUNCTION AGAINST IT IN FEDERAL COURT
  • AGAINST IT IN FEDERAL COURT VERY, VERY QUICKLY, AND THE BALL
  • VERY, VERY QUICKLY, AND THE BALL HAS LEFT THE SENATE AND MITCH
  • HAS LEFT THE SENATE AND MITCH McCONNELL COULD KIND OF GO ON
  • McCONNELL COULD KIND OF GO ON WITH BUSINESS.
  • WITH BUSINESS. >> WELL, THINK ABOUT THAT,
  • >> WELL, THINK ABOUT THAT, THOUGH, THAT THE ONLY ENDGAME
  • THOUGH, THAT THE ONLY ENDGAME THAT THEY CAN ENVISION INVOLVES
  • THAT THEY CAN ENVISION INVOLVES BASICALLY OVERRIDING THE
  • BASICALLY OVERRIDING THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS.
  • LEGISLATIVE PROCESS. >> YEAH.
  • >> YEAH. YEAH.
  • YEAH. >> THE REPUBLICAN PARTY HAS
  • >> THE REPUBLICAN PARTY HAS GOTTEN TO THE POINT WHERE THEY
  • GOTTEN TO THE POINT WHERE THEY COULD DO EXACTLY WHAT JOHN
  • COULD DO EXACTLY WHAT JOHN DESCRIBES AND MITCH McCONNELL,
  • DESCRIBES AND MITCH McCONNELL, YOU KNOW, IN THE BACK OF HIS
  • YOU KNOW, IN THE BACK OF HIS MIND, HE ALWAYS WANTS TO HAVE AN
  • MIND, HE ALWAYS WANTS TO HAVE AN END GAME, BUT FOR THE END GAME
  • END GAME, BUT FOR THE END GAME TO BE THE DECLARATION OF A
  • TO BE THE DECLARATION OF A NATIONAL EMERGENCY AND THE
  • NATIONAL EMERGENCY AND THE TRANSFER OF BILLIONS OF DEFENSE
  • TRANSFER OF BILLIONS OF DEFENSE DEPARTMENT DOLLARS TO THE WALL,
  • DEPARTMENT DOLLARS TO THE WALL, FOR THEM TO THINK THAT, OKAY,
  • FOR THEM TO THINK THAT, OKAY, WE’LL DO THAT BECAUSE THE COURTS
  • WE’LL DO THAT BECAUSE THE COURTS WILL PROBABLY THROW IT OUT, BUT
  • WILL PROBABLY THROW IT OUT, BUT THE PRECEDENT IS JUST HORRIBLE.
  • THE PRECEDENT IS JUST HORRIBLE. THIS IS A CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS,
  • THIS IS A CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS, AND IT IS JUST AN INDICATION,
  • AND IT IS JUST AN INDICATION, AGAIN, OF THE PRICE THEY ARE
  • AGAIN, OF THE PRICE THEY ARE PAYING FOR THE ACQUIESCENCE TO
  • PAYING FOR THE ACQUIESCENCE TO DONALD TRUMP AND THE ENABLING OF
  • DONALD TRUMP AND THE ENABLING OF DONALD TRUMP.
  • DONALD TRUMP. LOOK, THOSE POLL NUMBERS ARE BAD
  • LOOK, THOSE POLL NUMBERS ARE BAD TODAY.
  • TODAY. THEY’RE GOING TO BE A LOT WORSE
  • THEY’RE GOING TO BE A LOT WORSE AS I THINK THE DAMAGE FROM THE
  • AS I THINK THE DAMAGE FROM THE SHUTDOWN BECOMES CLEARER, AS THE
  • SHUTDOWN BECOMES CLEARER, AS THE COST BECOMES CLEARER.
  • COST BECOMES CLEARER. I ALSO THINK WHEN PEOPLE BEGIN
  • I ALSO THINK WHEN PEOPLE BEGIN TO THINK THROUGH THE CONCEPT OF
  • TO THINK THROUGH THE CONCEPT OF DECLARING A NATIONAL DEFENSE
  • DECLARING A NATIONAL DEFENSE EMERGENCY ON THE BORDER, I THINK
  • EMERGENCY ON THE BORDER, I THINK THERE’S GOING TO BE A TREMENDOUS
  • THERE’S GOING TO BE A TREMENDOUS BACKLASH TO THAT AS WELL.
  • BACKLASH TO THAT AS WELL. >> SAM STEIN, ANYONE WHO KNOWS
  • >> SAM STEIN, ANYONE WHO KNOWS ANYTHING ABOUT THE WAY THE ARMY
  • ANYTHING ABOUT THE WAY THE ARMY CORE OF ENGINEERS, THE DEFENSE
  • CORE OF ENGINEERS, THE DEFENSE DEPARTMENT SPENDS MONEY, DOES
  • DEPARTMENT SPENDS MONEY, DOES CONSTRUCTION, BUILDING THINGS,
  • CONSTRUCTION, BUILDING THINGS, ESPECIALLY THINGS THAT REQUIRE
  • ESPECIALLY THINGS THAT REQUIRE PERMITS, WHICH A LOT OF THEIR
  • PERMITS, WHICH A LOT OF THEIR STUFF DOESN’T IF IT’S BEING DONE
  • STUFF DOESN’T IF IT’S BEING DONE IN COMBAT ZONES, SAY IN
  • IN COMBAT ZONES, SAY IN AFGHANISTAN --
  • AFGHANISTAN -- >> SURE.
  • >> SURE. >> IF YOU’RE TRYING TO BUILD
  • >> IF YOU’RE TRYING TO BUILD SOMETHING IN TEXAS AND YOU ARE
  • SOMETHING IN TEXAS AND YOU ARE THE DEFENSE DEPARTMENT, YOU ARE
  • THE DEFENSE DEPARTMENT, YOU ARE A MINIMUM, IF YOU’RE COMPLETELY
  • A MINIMUM, IF YOU’RE COMPLETELY UNOBSTRUCTED BY THE POLITICAL
  • UNOBSTRUCTED BY THE POLITICAL PROCESS OR BY COURTS, YOU’RE A
  • PROCESS OR BY COURTS, YOU’RE A MINIMUM OF OVER A YEAR AWAY FROM
  • MINIMUM OF OVER A YEAR AWAY FROM A SHOVEL HITTING ANY DIRT
  • A SHOVEL HITTING ANY DIRT ANYWHERE IN TEXAS ON THE BORDER
  • ANYWHERE IN TEXAS ON THE BORDER TO BUILD THIS WALL.
  • TO BUILD THIS WALL. >> YEAH, ABSOLUTELY.
  • >> YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. AND THAT’S NOT EVEN MENTIONING
  • AND THAT’S NOT EVEN MENTIONING THE FACT THAT YOU ARE PROBABLY
  • THE FACT THAT YOU ARE PROBABLY USURPING AND TAKING THE EMINENT
  • USURPING AND TAKING THE EMINENT DOMAIN LAND FROM PRIVATE
  • DOMAIN LAND FROM PRIVATE RANCHERS WHO DON’T WANT ANYTHING
  • RANCHERS WHO DON’T WANT ANYTHING TO DO WITH THIS.
  • TO DO WITH THIS. YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT NOT JUST
  • YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT NOT JUST ONE LEGAL FIGHT BUT MANY, MANY
  • ONE LEGAL FIGHT BUT MANY, MANY LEGAL FIGHTS SPANNING ACROSS
  • LEGAL FIGHTS SPANNING ACROSS NUMEROUS JURISDICTIONS.
  • NUMEROUS JURISDICTIONS. AND ALL OF THIS, OF COURSE, IS
  • AND ALL OF THIS, OF COURSE, IS NOT TO MENTION THAT WE WERE
  • NOT TO MENTION THAT WE WERE PROMISED AT THE VERY BEGINNING
  • PROMISED AT THE VERY BEGINNING OF THIS THAT MEXICO WOULD PAY
  • OF THIS THAT MEXICO WOULD PAY FOR THIS WALL.
  • FOR THIS WALL. SO I’M NOT ENTIRELY SURE THAT A
  • SO I’M NOT ENTIRELY SURE THAT A NATIONAL EMERGENCY IS IN THE
  • NATIONAL EMERGENCY IS IN THE BEST POLITICAL INTERESTS FOR
  • BEST POLITICAL INTERESTS FOR TRUMP.
  • TRUMP. IT CREATES A WHOLE HOST OF
  • IT CREATES A WHOLE HOST OF POLITICAL AND LEGAL PROBLEMS.
  • POLITICAL AND LEGAL PROBLEMS. IT UNDERSCORES HOW HOLLOW HIS
  • IT UNDERSCORES HOW HOLLOW HIS INITIAL CAMPAIGN PROMISE WAS,
  • INITIAL CAMPAIGN PROMISE WAS, AND A LITTLE BIT NUANCED HERE,
  • AND A LITTLE BIT NUANCED HERE, BUT I HAPPEN TO THINK HE LIKES
  • BUT I HAPPEN TO THINK HE LIKES HAVING THE ISSUE OF THE WALL AS
  • HAVING THE ISSUE OF THE WALL AS A POLITICAL CUDGEL.
  • A POLITICAL CUDGEL. I DON’T -- I THINK PART OF HIM
  • I DON’T -- I THINK PART OF HIM WISHES IT WAS STILL OUT THERE
  • WISHES IT WAS STILL OUT THERE GOING INTO THE 2020 ELECTIONS
  • GOING INTO THE 2020 ELECTIONS AND THAT MIGHT BE GIVING HIM
  • AND THAT MIGHT BE GIVING HIM SOME HESITATION ABOUT DECLARING
  • SOME HESITATION ABOUT DECLARING THIS NATIONAL EMERGENCY, TOO.
  • THIS NATIONAL EMERGENCY, TOO. >> SAM, YOU’VE JUST HIT ON A
  • >> SAM, YOU’VE JUST HIT ON A THEORY THAT HAS BEEN ADVANCED BY
  • THEORY THAT HAS BEEN ADVANCED BY EZRA KLEIN.
  • EZRA KLEIN. EZRA’S GOING TO JOIN US LATER IN
  • EZRA’S GOING TO JOIN US LATER IN THE SHOW WITH EXACTLY THAT CASE,
  • THE SHOW WITH EXACTLY THAT CASE, THAT DONALD TRUMP DOESN’T
  • THAT DONALD TRUMP DOESN’T ACTUALLY WANT THE WALL, HE WANTS

Download subtitle

Right click on one of the buttons above and choose "Save Link As..." to download video

Description

Nancy Pelosi and Democrats held their position today- a firm no to the wall- while Donald Trump went to the Capitol to implore Republican lawmakers to hold his position to continue the shutdown. Lawrence discusses with Sam Stein, John Heilemann and Charlie Sykes.
» Subscribe to MSNBC: http://on.msnbc.com/SubscribeTomsnbc

About: MSNBC is the premier destination for in-depth analysis of daily headlines, insightful political commentary and informed perspectives. Reaching more than 95 million households worldwide, MSNBC offers a full schedule of live news coverage, political opinions and award-winning documentary programming -- 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com: http://on.msnbc.com/Readmsnbc
Subscribe to MSNBC Newsletter: MSNBC.com/NewslettersYouTube
Find MSNBC on Facebook: http://on.msnbc.com/Likemsnbc
Follow MSNBC on Twitter: http://on.msnbc.com/Followmsnbc
Follow MSNBC on Instagram: http://on.msnbc.com/Instamsnbc

Republican Describes Donald Trump's Handling Of The Shutdown As Total Chaos | The Last Word | MSNBC

HighResolutionMusic.com - Download Hi-Res Songs

1 Ariana Grande

7 Rings flac

Ariana Grande. 2019. Writer: Tayla Parx;Kimberly Krysiuk;Njomza Vitia;Scootie;Tommy Brown;Richard Rogers;Oscar Hammerstein II;Crazy Mike;Victoria Monét;Ariana Grande.
2 Alan Walker

Lily flac

Alan Walker. 2018. Writer: Alan Walker;Lars Kristian Rosness;Magnus Bertelsen;K-391;Didrik Handlykken;Marcus Arnbekk.
3 Alan Walker

Lost Control flac

Alan Walker. 2018. Writer: Alan Walker;Thomas Troelsen;Mood Melodies;Sorana;Fredrik Borch Olsen;Magnus "Magnify" Martinsen.
4 Skylar Grey

Everything I Need flac

Skylar Grey. 2018. Writer: Elliott Taylor;Rupert Gregson-Williams;Skylar Grey.
5 Alec Benjamin

Let Me Down Slowly flac

Alec Benjamin. 2019. Writer: Alec Benjamin;Sir Nolan;Michael Pollack.
6 Westlife

Hello My Love flac

Westlife. 2019. Writer: Steve Mac;Ed Sheeran.
7 Sam Smith

Fire On Fire flac

Sam Smith. 2018. Writer: Steve Mac;Sam Smith.
8 Conor Maynard

Way Back Home (Sam Feldt Edit) flac

Conor Maynard. 2018. Writer: Ji Hye Lee;Shaun.
9 Post Malone

Sunflower flac

Post Malone. 2018. Writer: Carl Rosen;Louis Bell;Billy Walsh;Carter Lang;Swae Lee;Post Malone.
10 Alan Walker

Different World flac

Alan Walker. 2018. Writer: Shy Nodi;Alan Walker;Fredrik Borch Olsen;James Njie;Marcus Arnbekk;Gunnar Greve Pettersen;K-391;Corsak;Shy Martin;Magnus Bertelsen.
11 Normani

Dancing With A Stranger flac

Normani. 2019. Writer: Mikkel S. Eriksen;Tor Hermansen;Jimmy Napes;Normani;Sam Smith.
12 The Chainsmokers

Hope flac

The Chainsmokers. 2018. Writer: Kate Morgan;Chris Lyon;Alex Pall;Andrew Taggart.
13 Imagine Dragons

Believer flac

Imagine Dragons. 2019. Writer: Dan Reynolds;Lil Wayne;Wayne Sermon;Ben McKee;Daniel Platzman;Robin Fredriksson;Mattias Larsson;Justin Tranter.
14 Slushii

Never Let You Go flac

Slushii. 2019. Writer: Sofía Reyes;Slushii;Aviella Winder.
15 Skrillex

Face My Fears flac

Skrillex. 2019. Writer: Poo Bear;Skrillex;Utada Hikaru.
16 Alan Walker

I Don't Wanna Go flac

Alan Walker. 2018.
17 Mike Perry

Runaway flac

Mike Perry. 2019. Writer: Andreas Wiman;Dimitri Vangelis;Richard Müller;Sasha Rangas;Stefan Van Leijsen;Mike Perry.
18 Hozier

Almost (Sweet Music) flac

Hozier. 2019. Writer: Hozier.
19 Gesaffelstein

Lost In The Fire flac

Gesaffelstein. 2019. Writer: Ahmad Balshe;Nate Donmoyer;Gesaffelstein;DaHeala;The Weeknd.
20 Maren Morris

Girl flac

Maren Morris. 2019. Writer: Maren Morris;Sarah Aarons;Greg Kurstin.

Popular this week

Related videos

TheTV in 90 countries


Categories